| COMMENTS
Section
29 provides a remedy to recover loan in a speedy manner. Section 31 can
be applied when a similar situation arises but it can be used only when
the Board allows it to be used; S.K. Kamiruddin v. Union of India, AIR
1993 Ori 238.
In
a petition by the Corporation to recover dues from its constituent, it
has been held the court has powers to grant more relief than what is sought,
in the sense that the interest at the agreed rate for period subsequent
to the petition could be ignored and must be included in the relief to
be granted in toto; M/s. Gulab Ram Subash Chander v. Kharaiti Lal, AIR
1988 P&H 45.
By
virtue of this section, the only mode of recovery of money due is by attachment
and sale of properties hypothecated, pledged, mortgaged or assigned to
the bank (financial corporation) and it shall prevail notwithstanding any
other inconsistent of law for the time being in force, and also the inherent
powers of the court to order a different mode of recovery; Gujarat State
Financial Corporation, Ahmedabad v. M/s. Jayshree Industries, Rajkot, AIR
1986 Guj 29.
Cross-objection
by respondent is maintainable in an appeal under this section; Punjab Financial
Corporation, Chandigarh v. M/s. Stylo Industries, AIR 1984 P&H 387.
Mortgagee
can not sell/dispose of the mortgaged property for redemption of mortgage
without prior permission of the Board. However, the Board does not have
absolute discretion for it can refuse such permission only on reasonable
and proper excuse; Mirza Javed Murtaza v. U.P. Financial Corporation, Kanpur,
AIR 1983 All 234.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Ins. by Act 77 of 1972, sec. 20.
2.
Ins. by Act 56 of 1956, sec. 15.
3.
Subs. by Act 56 of 1956, sec. 15, for "Corporation".
4.
Ins. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 19.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure
of district judge in respect of application under section 31.-
When
the application is for the reliefs mentioned in clauses (a) and (c) of
sub-section (1) of section 31. the district judge shall pass an ad interim
order attaching the security. or so much of the property of the industrial
concern as would on being sold realise in his estimate an amount equivalent
in value to the outstanding liability of the industrial concern to the
Financial Corporation, together with the costs of the proceedings taken
under section 31. with or without an ad interim injunction restraining
the industrial concern from transferring or removing its machinery, plant
or equipment.
4[When
the application is for the relief mentioned in clause (aa) of sub-section
(1) of section 31. the district judge shall issue a notice calling upon
the surety to show cause on a date to be specified in the notice why his
liability should not be enforced.]
When
the application is for the relief mentioned in clause (b) of sub-section
(1) of section 31. the district shall grant an ad interim injunction restraining
the industrial concern from transferring or removing its machinery, plant
or equipment and issue
a notice calling upon the industrial concern to show cause, on a date to
be specified in the notice, why the management of the industrial concern
should be transferred to the Financial Corporation.
Before
passing any order under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) 2[or
issuing a notice under sub-section (1A).] the district judge may, if he
thinks fit, examine the officer making the application.
3[
At the same time as he passes an order under sub-section] (1), the district
judge shall issue to the industrial concern or to the owner of the security
attached a notice accompanied by copies of the order, the application and
the evidence, if any, recorded by him calling upon it or him to show cause
on a date to be specified in the notice why the ad interim order of attachment
should not be made absolute or the injunction confirmed.
If
no cause is shown on or before the date specified in the notice under sub-section
(1A) the district judge shall forthwith order the enforcement of the liability
of the surety.]
If
no cause is shown on or before the date specified in the notice under sub-section
(1A) the district judge shall forthwith order the enforcement of the liability
of the surety.]
If
cause is shown, the district judge shall proceed to investigate the claim
of the Financial Corporation in accordance with the provisions contained
in the Code of Civil Procedure. 1908 (5 of 1908) in so far as such provisions
may be applied thereto.
After
making an investigation under sub-section (6). the district judge may-
confirm
the order of attachment and direct the sale of the attached property;
vary
the order of attachment so as to release a portion of the property from
attachment and direct the sale of the remainder of the attached property;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Ins. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20.
2.
Ins. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20.
3.
Subs. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20, for sub-section (4).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
release
the property from attachment;
confirm
or dissolve the injunction; 1[***];
2[direct
the enforecment of the liability of the surety or reject the claim made
in this behalf; or]
transfer
the management of the industrial concern to the Financial Corporation or
reject the claim made in this behalf;
Provided
that when making an order under clause (c) 2[or making an order
rejecting the claim to enforce the liability of the surety under clause
(da) or making an order rejecting the claim to transfer the management
of the industrial concern to the Financial Corporation under clause (e)],
the interest of the Financial Corporation and may apportion the costs of
the proceedings in such manner as he thinks fit :Provided further that
unless the Financial Corporation intimates to the district judge that it
will not appeal against any order releasing any property from attachment
3[or rejecting the claim to enforce the liability of the surety or rejecting
the claim to transfer the industrial concern to the Financial Corporation],
such order shall not be given effect to, until the expiry of the period
fixed under sub-section (9) within which an appeal may be preferred or,
if an appeal is preferred, unless the high Court otherwise directs until
the appeal is disposed of.
An
order of attachment or sale of property under this section shall be carried
into effect as far as practicable in the manner provided in the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) for the attachment or sale of property
in execution of a decree as if the Financial Corporation were the decree-holder.
4[An
order under this section transferring the management of an industrial concern
to the Financial Corporation shall be carried into effect, as far as may
be practicable, in the manner provided in the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) for the possession of immovable
property or the delivery of movable property in execution of a degree,
as if the Financial Corporation were the decree-holder.]
Any
party aggrieved by an order 5[under sub-section (4A), sub-section
(5)] or sub-section (7) may, within thirty days from the date of the order,
appeal to the High Court, and upon such appeal the High Court may, after
hearing the parties, pass such orders thereon as it thinks proper.
Where
proceedings for liquidation in respect of an industrial concern have commenced
before an application is made under sub-section (1) of section 31, nothing
in his section shall be construed as giving to the Financial Corporation
any preference over the other creditors of the industrial concern not conferred
on it by any other law. 6[The
functions of a district judge under this section shall be execrable-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
The word "or" omitted by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20.
2.
Ins. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20.
3.
Ins. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20.
4.
Ins. by Act 56 of 1956, sec, 16.
5.
Subs. by Act 43 of 1985, sec. 20, for "under sub-section (5)".
6.
Subs. by Act 6 of 1962, sec. 15, for sub-section (11).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in
a presidency town, where there is a city civil court having jurisdiction,
by a judge of that court and in the absence of such court, by the High
Court; and
elsewhere,
also by an additional district judge 1[or by any judge of the
principal court of civil jurisdiction].]
1[For
the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that any court competent to
grant an ad interim injunction under this section shall also have the power
to appoint a Receiver and to exercise all the other powers incidental thereto.]
|